The Causeway – history and beyond

Causeway

Yesterday marked the 91st anniversary of the Causeway. The first bridge linking Singapore and Malaysia opened to traffic on Oct 1, 1923.

Yesterday was also the day Singapore raised toll charges sharply – one month short of 30 years since tolls were introduced on the Causeway.

Together with a similar increase initiated by Malaysia in August, a round trip to Malaysia using the Causeway now costs about $13.10 – more than five times the cost before the revisions. The cost of a similar trip using the Second Link in the west remains unchanged at $12.40.

In the first 61 years of its operation, the bridge was a free thoroughfare. It was not until 1967 that immigration control was implemented.

According to SingaporeInfopedia, an electronic encyclopedia on Singapore’s history, there was a proposal for immigration control when Malaysia became independent from Britain in 1957. But this was shelved for fear that it would impede trade and affect the Malaysian economy.

Immigration control finally came into effect two years after Singapore’s separation from Malaysia in August 1965, following a chequered short two years when the two were one country in the Federation of Malaysia.

And pretty much since then, the Causeway has been a constant symbol of the often uneasy ties that bind the two neighbours.

It was, on many occasions, a bridge over troubled waters: when racial riots broke out in 1964, and only people with special passes could cross; when water supply talks broke down (more than once); and even when the Malaysian side instituted on-off measures that made it a bit more cumbersome to cross (white immigration forms, fingerprint readers).

And, of course, whenever toll fees were raised.

The Causeway was also, according to Malaysia, an impediment to shipping. In 1996, then Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad proposed that the Causeway be replaced by a raised bridge that would allow ships to pass. Singapore, keen to preserve the competitiveness of its port, objected.

Interestingly, it was also in 1996 that Singapore’s former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew dropped a bombshell when he said that Singapore-Malaysia reunification could happen, albeit under certain conditions.

“It will be difficult to achieve for a very long time, but I hope it will happen,” Mr Lee, who turned 91 recently, said then.

In 2007, he again made a similar remark publicly. That year, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak scrapped Dr Mahathir’s plans for a “crooked bridge” and said the Causeway would remain.

On both occasions, Mr Lee’s comments created shockwaves on both sides of the Causeway, even if it is doubtful that anyone in power actually took them seriously.

Of course, talk about the two countries becoming one again is just fodder for good coffee shop banter now. Just as the sharp toll hikes are a talking point on both sides of the Causeway, even if the much-hyped economic impact is dubious.

In the meanwhile, the 2nd link begins to look more attractive – a positive for Nusajaya.

 

This entry was posted in Iskandar Information and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s